Have to agree with some of the other comments. This piece comes across as incredibly condescending. Especially from someone who hasn't actually "lived" as a digital nomad. Many countries do in fact ask digital workers their opinions and insights, heck some DNVs require the applicants to provide cover letters on how they will improve the new community they intend to live in.

Some countries do offer DNVs as a money grab, but there are plenty of others that do want to cultivate enrichment for both the workers and locals.

I've lived in Argentina for several years, pay rent, bills, etc. Before that I lived in Lima, but that was six-months in an Airbnb. And I would absolutely say I lived in Lima. I had a routine, gym membership, I knew when shops opened, which park workers were on duty when I walked my dogs. In many ways, despite staying in Peru 1/6 the time, I'd say my time was much more complete. Length of time really has nothing to do with it.

I'm sorry, but this entire piece just comes off as holier-than-though. It's great you're looking at moving and want to enjoy life somewhere else. Go where your happiest/go where you're most appreciated, is what I always say. I just don't understand the need to chastise someone for saying they live somewhere based on their length of time. If someone wants to say they lived in a country after only being there for 90 days why get upset about it? So what if they posted a bunch of trumped up Instagram posts?

If there's one thing I've learned about living abroad, it's people can't stand Americans with an ego.

And, to me, this entire piece was nothing but ego.